Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 115/2019 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held lower court must notify principal hearing when defendant requests hearing on fraud-related sentencing factors.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 115/2019
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal failed its duty by not notifying the principal hearing after the defendant requested to be heard on fraud-related sentencing factors. The defendant argued that without this notification, they could not effectively present evidence regarding the circumstances influencing the sentence. The court decided the lower court violated procedural rights by ignoring the request, mandating that such notifications be made to ensure fair trial participation.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Korkein oikeus 10.1.2019 115/2019: Rikosoikeudenkäyntilain 101 §; Rikosoikeudenkäyntilain 102 §: When a defendant requests to be heard on facts affecting sentencing, the lower court must notify the principal hearing to ensure procedural fairness.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
criminal procedure principal hearing notification duty sentencing factors right to be heard fraud case procedural fairness Verletzung der Begründungspflicht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Rikosoikeudenkäyntilaki 101 §
Rikosoikeudenkäyntilaki 102 §
KI-generiert
kko-other_2010_2387
Supreme Court held that lower courts must transfer cases involving serious fraud to the main court.
kko-other_2001_506
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding failure to submit case file to lower court in criminal proceedings.
kko-other_2008_302
Supreme Court held lower court must provide main hearing details to defendant upon request.
kko-other_2001_1437
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding failure to submit case file to lower court in criminal proceedings.
kko-precedent_2000_62
Supreme Court allows retrial in criminal appeal when lower court misjudged witness credibility without new evidence.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys hovioikeuden velvollisuudesta toimittaa pääkäsittely, kun rikosasian vastaaja on vaatinut itsensä kuulemista rangaistuksen määräämiseen vaikuttavista seikoista petoksia koskevassa asiassa.