Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 655/2017 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses drunk driving charge where only non-impaired cannabis metabolite was detected in blood.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 655/2017
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the defendant's drunk driving charge because only a cannabis metabolite without impairing effects was found in their blood. The prosecution argued for a conviction based on the presence of the substance, while the defense contended that the specific metabolite, carboxy-THC, does not affect driving ability. The court ruled that since the statutory requirements for impaired driving were not met due to the lack of actual impairment, the charge could not stand.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Rikoslaki 39/1988; Rikostilanne 10/1994: A charge of drunk driving is not established if the only detected substance is a metabolite that does not impair driving ability.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
drunk driving charge cannabis metabolite driving impairment carboxy-THC Supreme Court Finland criminal liability statutory requirements Substanzen menschlichen Ursprungs

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Rikoslaki 39/1988
Rikostilanne 10/1994
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2009_73
Supreme Court allows separate drug use charge when driving under influence, rejecting prior case precedent.
kko-precedent_2016_42
Supreme Court allows conviction for drug driving when metabolites are present but do not impair driving ability.
kko-other_1996_1549
Supreme Court held that driving while intoxicated by alcohol and another drug proves knowledge of the latter's effects.
kko-precedent_2000_5
Supreme Court orders retrial in robbery case where defendant contests threat evidence credibility without hearing witnesses.
market_2019_526
Market Court quashes decision for retrial but dismisses claim for reimbursement of legal costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kuljettajan veressä oli ajon jälkeen ollut vain sellaista kannabiksen vaikuttavan aineen aineenvaihduntatuotetta (karboksitetrahydrokannabinolia), jolla ei ole vaikutusta ajokykyyn. Rattijuopumuksen tunnusmerkistö ei täyttynyt.