Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2402/2017 KI-generiert

Supreme Court remands estate case to lower court after accepting new will evidence.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2402/2017
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland remanded the estate dispute to the district court following the acceptance of new evidence regarding a second will. The lower court had previously declared the will invalid because it could not be found in the estate, but the beneficiary now submitted a document claiming to be a second will. The Court ruled that this new evidence required reconsideration by the lower court to determine its validity and impact on the inheritance distribution.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Testamentilaki 1929; Perinnöslaki 1978: When new evidence of a previously unknown will is presented to the Supreme Court, the case must be remanded to the lower court for a fresh examination of the will's validity and its effect on the estate distribution.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
will invalidity estate distribution new evidence remand procedure inheritance law testamentary capacity supreme court review Testamentseröffnung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Testamentilaki 1929
Perinnöslaki 1978
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1994_104
Supreme Court allows widow's inheritance claim against her heirs, rejecting lower court dismissal for lack of secondary beneficiaries. The court also validates the husband's signature on the joint will.
kko-other_1997_66
Supreme Court allows will invalidation claim when later criminal judgment proves total forgery despite prior form defect ruling.
kko-other_2019_638
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court wrongly denied further proceedings permission due to factual error.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2022:20
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when defendant's personal presence is required for appeal hearing. Appeal dismissed due to procedural error in handling defendant's absence.
kko-precedent_2004_126
Supreme Court allows Supreme Court to examine judge's recusal based on close relationship without party objection.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Perilliset vaativat testamentin julistamista tehottomaksi, koska testamenttia ei ollut löytynyt perittävän jäämistöstä. Hovioikeus julisti testamentin tehottomaksi siltä osin kuin se esti perillisiä saamasta osuuttaan jäämistöstä.

Testamentin saaja haki muutosta hovioikeuden tuomioon ja esitti Korkeimmassa oikeudessa testamentista kappaleen, jonka ilmoitti olevan toisen kahdesta laaditusta kappaleesta. Korkeimmassa oikeudessa esitetty uusi selvitys otettiin huomioon ja asia palautettiin käräjäoikeuteen käsiteltäväksi.