Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2559/2016 KI-generiert

Lease term fixed for three years then indefinite; court ruled term was indefinite with six-month notice.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2559/2016
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that a lease agreement containing a three-year fixed term followed by an indefinite period was interpreted as having an indefinite term with a six-month notice period. The parties argued over whether the initial fixed term created a definitive end date or merely a transition to an ongoing arrangement. The court determined that the structure of the clause indicated an indefinite duration rather than a strictly defined term.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Lease Act 1993, s. 10; Lease Act 1993, s. 11: A lease clause specifying a fixed term followed by an indefinite period is interpreted as establishing an indefinite term subject to statutory notice requirements.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
lease term interpretation fixed term lease indefinite lease notice period contract duration termination notice lease agreement Dauer der Zuwiderhandlung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Lease Act 1993, s. 10
Lease Act 1993, s. 11
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2014_4
Supreme Court allows appeal for unclear lease termination rules between fixed and periodic terms.
appeal_1976_turku__3508
Fixed-term tenancy clause cannot restrict statutory termination procedures under Housing Act Section 4.
kko-precedent_2004_34
Supreme Court allows tenant to terminate fixed-term lease early, ruling termination applies to renewal period only.
appeal_1978_helsinki__301
Court dismissed tenant's appeal, ruling consecutive fixed-term leases without notice constitute implied termination.
appeal_1984_eastern-finland__1856
Court allows early termination of fixed-term lease by adjusting rent to avoid unfairness.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Liikehuoneiston vuokrasopimuksen ehdon mukaan sopimus oli voimassa kolme vuotta jatkuen sen jälkeen toistaiseksi kuuden kuukauden irtisanomisajalla. Kysymys siitä, olivatko sopijapuolet sopineet vuokrasopimuksen kestosta siten, että sopimus oli voimassa määräajan vai toistaiseksi.