Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2416/2016 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses claim against supplier for crane damage during transport under Commercial Code.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2416/2016
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the carrier's claim against the crane supplier for damages incurred during transport. The carrier purchased a truck with a crane installed by the supplier, and the crane was damaged while in the carrier's possession. The court ruled that the supplier was not liable under the Commercial Code because the damage occurred outside the scope of the installation contract.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Commercial Code s. 10; Commercial Code s. 11: A supplier is not liable for damage to goods occurring after delivery and outside the scope of the supply contract unless specific contractual obligations are breached.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Commercial Code liability supplier warranty scope transport damage exclusion contractual privity commercial code interpretation Frachtführerhaftung nicht betriebssicheres Fahrzeug fehlerhafte Anlage

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Commercial Code s. 10
Commercial Code s. 11
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2012_101
Supreme Court allows seller to recover buyer's litigation costs from prior dispute as direct damage under Commercial Code.
appeal_1984_rovaniemi__1120
Consumer rejected repair of minor car defects; court dismissed price reduction claim due to lack of value loss evidence.
appeal_1982_eastern-finland__1630
Court dismisses claim for damages when insurance company fails to investigate partial liability properly.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2023:73
Supreme Court limits criminal fraud compensation to creditors' total claims, not the full misappropriated amount.
kko-precedent_1997_179
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; breach of contract damages must be foreseeable to be recoverable.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kuljetusyritys A oli hankkinut kuorma-auton ja sen vaihtolavalle asennettavan nosturin. Se oli neuvotellut nosturin hankinnasta ja sen hinnasta B:n kanssa, joka oli myös asentanut nosturin. Autoliike C, josta kuljetusyritys oli hankkinut kuorma-auton, oli maksanut nosturin B:lle. CE-merkinnällä varustettu nosturi oli vaurioitunut kuljetusyrityksen käytössä. A katsoi, että nosturi oli virheellinen ja B oli vastuussa nosturin korjauskustannuksista. Kysymys B:n vastuusta kauppalain nojalla taikka muulla perusteella.