Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions due to statute of limitations expiry.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages arising from an illegal competition restriction. The plaintiff argued that the defendant's conduct violated competition laws, but the court found the claim time-barred under the general statute of limitations. Consequently, the court ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid cause of action due to the passage of time.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertL kilpailunrajoituksista (480/1992) 18 a § 3 mom (303/1998); VanhL 7 § 1 mom: A claim for damages resulting from an illegal competition restriction is subject to the general statute of limitations and must be brought within the prescribed period.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Kysymys kielletystä kilpailunrajoituksesta aiheutuneen vahingon korvaamista koskevan vaatimuksen vanhentumisesta. Ks. KKO:2016:11
L kilpailunrajoituksista (480/1992) 18 a § 3 mom (303/1998)
VanhL 7 § 1 mom