Claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions dismissed due to statute of limitations expiration.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages arising from an illegal competition restriction. The plaintiff argued that the defendant's conduct caused financial loss, but the court found the claim time-barred under the general statute of limitations. Consequently, the court ruled that the right to claim damages had expired because the limitation period had passed without interruption.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertL kilpailunrajoituksista (480/1992) 18 a § 3 mom (303/1998); VanhL 7 § 1 mom: A claim for damages resulting from an illegal competition restriction is subject to the general statute of limitations, and failure to file within the prescribed period results in the loss of the right to claim.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Kysymys kielletystä kilpailunrajoituksesta aiheutuneen vahingon korvaamista koskevan vaatimuksen vanhentumisesta. Ks. KKO:2016:11
L kilpailunrajoituksista (480/1992) 18 a § 3 mom (303/1998)
VanhL 7 § 1 mom