Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions due to statute of limitations expiry.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages arising from an illegal competition restriction. The plaintiff argued that the defendant's conduct violated competition laws, but the court found the claim time-barred under the general statute of limitations. Consequently, the court ruled that the plaintiff failed to establish a valid cause of action due to the expiration of the limitation period.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLaki kilpailunrajoituksista (480/1992) 18 a § 3 mom; Vanhentumislaki 7 § 1 mom: A claim for damages based on an illegal competition restriction is barred if the general statute of limitations has expired.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Kysymys kielletystä kilpailunrajoituksesta aiheutuneen vahingon korvaamista koskevan vaatimuksen vanhentumisesta. Ks. KKO:2016:11
L kilpailunrajoituksista (480/1992) 18 a § 3 mom (303/1998)
VanhL 7 § 1 mom