Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1238/2015 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows retrial when new confession by another person materially affects the original theft case facts.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1238/2015
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the case to be retried after a new confession by a second individual was discovered. The original defendant had been convicted of serious theft and payment instrument fraud, but the new evidence suggested the second person committed the crimes. The court ruled that this new material fact necessitated a fresh examination of the evidence and the original verdict's validity.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 24 of the Code of Judicial Procedure; where new evidence obtained after the first-instance judgment materially affects the facts of the case, the case must be remitted for retrial to ensure a fair trial based on all available evidence.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
new confession evidence retrial procedure material facts change fair trial rights remittal to lower court Grundsatz ne bis in idem Wiedereröffnung der Untersuchung Revision in Strafsachen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 24 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1996_133
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; remand for hearing absent owner was improper when only defendant sought review.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:2
Supreme Court allows partial amendment of drug charge when original conviction bars new trial on same conduct.
kko-other_1996_5006
Criminal penalty claim dismissed; case remitted for new investigation after witness information arrived post-judgment.
kko-other_2001_2529
Supreme Court allows retrial of murder charge due to new evidence challenging original conviction.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli tuomittu rangaistukseen törkeästä varkaudesta ja maksuvälinepetoksesta. Hovioikeuden tuomion antamisen jälkeen toinen henkilö oli esitutkinnassa tunnustanut tehneensä rikokset. Uusi selvitys otettiin huomioon ja juttu palautettiin käräjäoikeuteen uudelleen käsiteltäväksi.