Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 277/2014 KI-generiert

Supreme Court remands insurance claim for chronic cheek infection as professional disease due to insufficient factual findings.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 277/2014
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland remanded the case to the insurance authority for re-evaluation. The applicant sought compensation for a chronic cheek infection classified as a professional disease, but the original decision lacked specific factual findings and legal reasoning supporting this classification. The court ruled that without these essential elements, the decision could not stand and must be reconsidered by the lower authority.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Insurance Act; Liability Act: When an insurance authority's decision fails to provide specific factual findings and legal reasoning regarding the classification of a condition as a professional disease, the decision is remanded for re-evaluation.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
professional disease classification insurance liability claim chronic cheek infection insufficient factual findings remand for re-evaluation Supreme Court of Finland insurance authority decision vordienstliche Gesundheitsschädigung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Insurance Act
Liability Act
KI-generiert
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:43
Supreme Court dismisses occupational disease claim for asthma caused by mold exposure due to insufficient causal evidence.
kko-other_1995_149
Supreme Court held that strong evidence of occupational asbestos exposure requires insurer to prove non-work-related cause to deny claim.
insurance_2013_5216-2011
Insurance court allows occupational disease claim for chronic heat exhaustion based on medical evidence of workplace exposure.
kko-other_2002_16
Supreme Court dismisses claim for occupational disease compensation for asthma caused by mold exposure in wood treatment work.
insurance_2019_1206-2018
Insurance court dismisses appeal against administrative board decision for lack of reviewable substantive ruling.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Koska vakuutusoikeuden päätöksestä ei ilmennyt niitä tosiseikkoja ja sitä oikeudellista päättelyä, jolla kroonisen poskiontelotulehduksen korvaamiseen ammattitautina oli päädytty, asia palautettiin vakuutusoikeuteen uudelleen käsiteltäväksi.