Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2700/2014 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows cross-border insolvency proceedings in Finland against a Singapore company under EU Regulation.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2700/2014
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed a cross-border insolvency proceeding initiated by a Finnish insolvency administrator against a Singapore-based company. Although the respondent lacked a domicile in an EU member state, the lower court correctly applied the EU Insolvency Regulation to assert jurisdiction. The court upheld this decision, confirming that the Regulation's provisions on jurisdiction apply regardless of the respondent's location within the Union.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

EU Insolvency Regulation Art. 3(1); The jurisdiction of the court of the Member State where the debtor has its centre of main interests applies to cross-border insolvency proceedings initiated by an insolvency administrator, even if the debtor is not domiciled in that Member State.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
EU Insolvency Regulation cross-border insolvency jurisdiction of courts centre of main interests insolvency administrator Singapore company Finnish Supreme Court internationaler Wettbewerb

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
EU Insolvency Regulation Art. 3(1)
Art. 1 kohta
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2014_100
Supreme Court allows bankruptcy trustee's recovery claim against non-EU defendants under EU Insolvency Regulation.
kko-precedent_2012_63
Supreme Court allows bankruptcy trustee's claim for recovery against foreign companies with Finnish assets.
kko-precedent_2007_68
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; Finnish court lacks jurisdiction over US companies due to insufficient connection.
kko-precedent_2011_25
Supreme Court denies bankruptcy court jurisdiction over foreign defendants in asset recovery and asset tracing claims.
kko-precedent_2013_84
Shareholder not bound by arbitration clause; court case dismissed as dispute must be arbitrated.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

X Oy oli asetettu konkurssiin suomalaisessa tuomioistuimessa. X Oy:n konkurssipesä nosti samassa tuomioistuimessa takaisinsaantikanteen Singaporesta olevaa yhtiötä vastaan.

Takaisinsaantikanne oli Euroopan unionin maksukyvyttömyysasetuksessa tarkoitettu maksukyvyttömyysmenettelyyn liittyvä asia. Käräjäoikeus oli maksukyvyttömyysasetuksen nojalla toimivaltainen tutkimaan kanteen, vaikka vastaajalla ei ollut kotipaikkaa jäsenvaltiossa.

EU:n maksukyvyttömyysmenettelyistä annettu asetus 3 art 1 kohta