Supreme Court held the district court lacked jurisdiction over a banking investment dispute due to subject matter limitations.

Supreme Court held that a local agreement is not a collective agreement if it lacks general applicability and binding force. The court dismissed the appeal regarding the court's duty to clarify wage payment issues. The decision clarifies the distinction between local agreements and collective agreements under Finnish labor law. The court ruled that the lower court did not err in its assessment of the agreement's nature. The judgment emphasizes the requirement for general applicability to constitute a collective agreement. This case establishes the criteria for determining the legal status of local employment agreements. The ruling provides guidance on wage disputes involving non-binding local agreements. The decision affirms the strict interpretation of collective agreement requirements in Finnish law.

Supreme Court allows bank claim against borrower for debt arising from a fraudulent loan scheme. The court held that the bank's knowledge of the fraud made the claim not contrary to good faith.

Supreme Court dismisses claim that a commercial bank board member is in an employment relationship under the Employment Contracts Act.

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding binding force of bank guarantee signed outside open bank account.

Labour court dismisses union claim that government violated collective agreement on salary adjustments.