Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 945/2013 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding right to trial by jury for minor crimes by civil servant.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 945/2013
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal challenging the requirement for a jury trial in a specific criminal case. The appellant, a civil servant, argued that the prosecution for minor offenses like assault and discrimination violated the right to trial by jury under Section 118 of the Constitution. The court held that the statutory provisions governing jury trials do not extend to these specific minor crimes committed by the appellant, thereby upholding the original decision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 118 of the Constitution; Section 1 of the Act on the Right to Trial by Jury; The right to trial by jury does not apply to minor criminal offenses committed by civil servants.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
right to trial by jury civil servant liability minor criminal offenses Constitutional right prosecution scope privilegierter Tatbestand gemeingefährliche Straftaten Härtefallgründe

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 118 of the Constitution
Section 1 of the Act on the Right to Trial by Jury
KI-generiert
kko-other_2013_946
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding right to trial for public servant accused of discrimination.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2021:56
Spitting with HIV threat constitutes obstruction of duty, not violence, under Finnish Criminal Code Section 16.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__613
Court dismisses appeal against conviction for intentional official misconduct and drunkenness during official duties. Defendant was fined for failing duties while intoxicated.
kko-precedent_2006_33
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; individual acts are not one crime due to lack of continuous intent.
kko-precedent_1992_126
Supreme Court convicted court officials for negligent duty breach by failing to serve civil claims in criminal trials.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys perustuslain 118 §:n 3 momentin mukaisesta syyteoikeudesta A:n vaadittua virkamiehelle rangaistusta paitsi törkeästä virka-aseman väärinkäyttämisestä tai tuottamuksellisesta virkavelvollisuuden rikkomisesta myös siitä, että tämä oli julkista tehtävää hoitaessaan syyllistynyt pahoinpitelyyn tai vammantuottamukseen sekä heitteillepanoon ja syrjintään.