Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2022/2013 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding state defense lawyer fee liability when client had right to free legal aid.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2022/2013
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the Court of Appeal's order for the respondent to pay the state's defense lawyer fees. The respondent argued they were entitled to free legal aid without a co-contribution, yet the lower court held them liable for the fees. The court ruled that the lower court correctly applied the law by requiring payment despite the respondent's eligibility for free aid.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 10 of the Legal Aid Act 1999; Section 10 of the Legal Aid Act 1999: A party liable for defense costs remains so even if they qualify for free legal aid without co-contribution.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
legal aid co-contribution defense lawyer fees state liability legal aid eligibility fee reimbursement Rückforderung von Subventionen Rentenverrechnung Anrechnung von Teilzahlungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 10 of the Legal Aid Act 1999
KI-generiert
kko-other_2008_688
Supreme Court dismisses lawyer's fee claim when defense mandate is legally suspended during appeal proceedings.
kko-precedent_1992_36
Supreme Court allows lawyer fee for assisting defendant in lower court appeal but denies appeal filing fee.
kko-other_1999_1823
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding payment made after lower court judgment to be considered in final ruling.
kko-precedent_1999_1
Supreme Court remands debt restructuring case for retrial due to failure to inform debtor of non-personal liability debts.
kko-precedent_2002_109
Supreme Court allows lawyer fees when appeal is not clearly baseless despite defendant's absence.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Hovioikeus oli velvoittanut vastaajan korvaamaan valtiolle tämän puolustajalle hovioikeudessa valtion varoista maksettavaksi määrätyn palkkion, vaikka vastaajalla olisi ollut oikeus oikeusapuun ilman omavastuuosuutta. Kysymys hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta.