Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2021/2013 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows fee claim for defense counsel regarding unexplained dismissal of time-based costs by lower court.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2021/2013
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the defense counsel's claim for fees related to the head of case and travel time. The lower court had dismissed part of the claim without providing a reasoned explanation for rejecting the time-based costs. The court held that a lower court must justify its dismissal of such claims rather than doing so arbitrarily.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10. a. 1. momentti; Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10. a. 2. momentti: A lower court must provide a reasoned explanation when dismissing a claim for legal fees based on time spent, rather than arbitrarily rejecting the request.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
legal fees defense counsel time-based costs lower court duty reasoned explanation Supreme Court review procedural fairness Hingabe erfüllungshalber

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10. a. 1. momentti
Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10. a. 2. momentti
KI-generiert
kko-other_2010_2476
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding defense lawyer's claim for travel expenses due to lack of court ruling.
kko-other_2021_1293
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding court costs and lawyer fees for a civil procedure case.
kko-other_2010_1914
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding lower court's duty to serve notice of invalidity declaration in debt dispute.
kko-other_2008_688
Supreme Court dismisses lawyer's fee claim when defense mandate is legally suspended during appeal proceedings.
kko-precedent_2000_96
Supreme Court remands case for retrial on damages amount due to appellate court's failure to investigate missing facts.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Puolustaja oli hovioikeudessa vaatinut palkkiota pääkäsittelystä ja matka-ajasta. Kysymys siitä, oliko hovioikeus voinut perustelematta hylätä osan toteutuneeseen ajankäyttöön perustuneista vaatimuksista.