Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 3/2012 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held that multiple minor thefts constitute a crime when viewed as a whole.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 3/2012
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that the defendant's series of minor thefts from various stores constituted a crime when evaluated as a whole. The prosecution argued that the cumulative value and frequency of the acts met the threshold for criminal liability despite individual instances being small. The court agreed, establishing that the aggregate nature of the offenses satisfied the legal requirements for conviction under the relevant theft statute.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

RL 28 luku 3 § 1 mom; The court held that multiple minor thefts, when considered collectively, satisfy the statutory requirements for criminal liability if the cumulative value and frequency demonstrate a pattern of unlawful possession.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
theft cumulative value minor offenses aggregate criminal threshold met repeated property crimes statutory interpretation theft verbrauchbare Sache Ähnlichkeit der Waren oder Dienstleistungen geringfügiges Vermögensdelikt

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
RL 28 luku 3 § 1 mom
KI-generiert
kko-other_2012_2
Supreme Court holds that multiple minor thefts constitute a crime when viewed as a whole.
kko-precedent_2011_66
Supreme Court reclassified petty thefts as snatching and reduced sentence due to significant change in charge classification.
appeal_1978_kouvola__355
Court dismissed appeal for lack of right of appeal regarding reclassification of smuggling charge.
appeal_1980_kouvola__1523
Single punishment applies for smuggling and selling the same alcohol batch under Finnish law.
kko-precedent_2006_76
Supreme Court allows separate drug use charge when no general vs special law relationship exists between traffic offense and drug use.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli anastanut usealla eri kerralla eri myymälöistä arvoltaan vähäisinä pidettäviä määriä omaisuutta, muun muassa alkoholijuomia, tupakkaa, postimerkkejä, bensiiniä ja elintarvikkeita. Kysymys siitä, oliko anastuksia myös kokonaisuutena arvostellen pidettävä vähäisinä.

RL 28 luku 3 § 1 mom