KKO 133/2012
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed defense fee claim as it was not properly substantiated by the lower court's decision.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the defense fee claim because the lower court failed to explicitly state the amount awarded. The defense argued for a specific fee based on the complexity of the case, while the prosecution contended the fee was already covered by general costs. The court ruled that without a clear determination of the fee amount in the lower court's decision, the claim could not be substantiated for appeal.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertKorkein oikeus 10.1.1996 100/1995; Korkein oikeus 10.1.1996 101/1995: The Supreme Court held that a claim for defense fees is inadmissible if the lower court's decision does not explicitly determine the amount of the fee awarded.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
defense fee claim
substantiation requirement
lower court decision
fee amount determination
inadmissible appeal
procedural defect
costs allocation
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertKorkein oikeus 10.1.1996 100/1995
Korkein oikeus 10.1.1996 101/1995
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertKKO 100/1995
KKO 101/1995
Volltext
Kysymys puolustajan palkkiosta.