Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1598/2011 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held that a local agreement is not a collective agreement if it lacks general applicability and binding force. The court dismissed the appeal regarding the court's duty to clarify wage payment issues. The decision clarifies the distinction between local agreements and collective agreements under Finnish labor law. The court ruled that the lower court did not err in its assessment of the agreement's nature. The judgment emphasizes the requirement for general applicability to constitute a collective agreement. This case establishes the criteria for determining the legal status of local employment agreements. The ruling provides guidance on wage disputes involving non-binding local agreements. The decision affirms the strict interpretation of collective agreement requirements in Finnish law.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1598/2011
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the district court's decision regarding the duty to clarify wage payments. The employer claimed wages were paid according to a local agreement, while the employee contested its status as a collective agreement. The court ruled that the local agreement lacked the necessary general applicability and binding force to qualify as a collective agreement, thus the lower court's assessment was correct.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Työlainsäädäntö; Työsopimuslaki: A local agreement is not a collective agreement unless it applies generally to all employees in the enterprise and binds both parties, as required by the Act on the Working Environment and the Act on Collective Agreements.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
collective agreement definition local agreement status general applicability requirement binding force criteria wage payment dispute labor law interpretation employer employee rights Pfandausfall

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Act on the Working Environment
Act on Collective Agreements
KI-generiert
labour_2024_9
Local agreement on union representative furlough rejected due to lack of authority and ratification.
labour_1987_124
Labor court dismisses union claim but fines employer and union for breaching collective agreement on substitute worker rules.
labour_1998_27
Labor court orders employer to pay vacation return pay and penalty for contract breach.
labour_1998_11
Labor court dismisses union claims but fines unions for strike actions violating collective agreement terms.
labour_1983_98
Labor court dismissed union claim that city violated collective agreement by unilaterally allocating reserve funds.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys käräjäoikeuden selvittelyvelvollisuudesta palkkasaatavia koskevassa asiassa, jossa työnantaja väitti maksaneensa palkan työehtosopimuksen osaksi tulleen paikallisen sopimuksen mukaan ja työntekijä muun ohella kiisti paikallisen sopimuksen työehtosopimusluonteen.