Supreme Court dismisses claim against bank lawyer for liability regarding transfer of company assets abroad to avoid creditors.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages against a bank lawyer involved in transferring a company's assets abroad to evade creditors. The plaintiff argued the lawyer breached professional duties by facilitating the asset transfer, while the defendant contended the action was a legitimate business decision. The court ruled that no breach of duty occurred because the lawyer acted within professional standards and the transfer did not constitute fraud or negligence.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertVahingonkorvauslaki 5 luku 1 §; A lawyer is not liable for damages when transferring company assets abroad to avoid creditors if the action was taken in good faith and without negligence or breach of professional duty.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Yhtiön varat oli siirretty ulkomaille velkojien ulottumattomiin. Kysymys siirtoon osallistuneen pankkilakimiehen korvausvastuun edellytysten arvioimisesta.
VahL 5 luku 1 §