Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 432/2010 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows appeal against bankruptcy secured claim dismissal due to missing creditor statement.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 432/2010
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of First Instance dismissed the appeal against a secured claim in bankruptcy proceedings because the creditor failed to submit a written statement. The Court of Appeal found this procedural error prevented a proper trial and ordered the case to be retried. Consequently, the Supreme Court upheld the retrial order, mandating the lower court to schedule a hearing for the creditor to provide the required statement.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act 1998; Section 2 of the Bankruptcy Act 1998: When a secured claim in bankruptcy proceedings is dismissed due to the creditor's failure to submit a written statement, the court must correct the procedural error and allow the creditor an opportunity to provide the statement.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
bankruptcy secured claim procedural error correction creditor written statement appeal against dismissal retrial order Verfahrensmangel Erledigung des Hauptstreits Grundsatz der Lex mitior

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 10 of the Bankruptcy Act 1998
Section 2 of the Bankruptcy Act 1998
KI-generiert
kko-other_2009_2319
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court wrongly issues default judgment during preparation phase.
kko-precedent_1994_26
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court relied on unheard expert opinion regarding collective agreement applicability.
kko-precedent_2013_14
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when High Court wrongly denies retrial while altering lower court's reasoning.
kko-other_1997_1608
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court rejected incomplete complaint without notice due to respondent's possession of full document.
kko-precedent_1997_90
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lower court bases verdict on facts not argued by parties without hearing them.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Käsitellessään konkurssissa valvotun saatavan riitautusta käräjäoikeus oli jättänyt asian sillensä, koska saatavansa valvonut velkoja ei ollut antanut pyydettyä kirjallista lausumaa. Velkojan hakemuksesta hovioikeus katsoi, ettei käräjäoikeuden olisi tullut jättää asiaa sillensä, vaan ratkaista se tuomiolla. Oikeudenkäyntivirheen johdosta hovioikeus poisti käräjäoikeuden päätöksen, palautti asian käräjäoikeuteen uudelleen käsiteltäväksi ja määräsi käräjäoikeuden varaamaan velkojalle tilaisuuden antaa lausuma riitautuksen johdosta.

Kysymys hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta.