Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2476/2010 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding defense lawyer's claim for travel expenses due to lack of court ruling.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2476/2010
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the lower court's procedural handling of a defense lawyer's claim for travel expenses. The Court of First Instance had not issued a ruling on the specific expense claim, leading the defense lawyer to question the legality of the proceedings. The Supreme Court determined that without a formal decision on the claim, the procedural defect did not justify overturning the main judgment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Korkein oikeus 10.12.2009 2476/2010: Korkeimmassa oikeudessa on tarkasteltu, onko hovioikeuden menettely oikeellinen, kun puolustaja on vaatinut matkakuluja ja hovioikeus ei ole lausunut vaatimuksesta. Korkein oikeus on päättänyt, että menettely on ollut oikeellinen, koska puuttuva lausunto ei ole vaikuttanut oikeudenkäynnin lopputulokseen.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
defense lawyer expenses travel cost claim procedural defect Court of First Instance Supreme Court appeal lack of ruling procedural legality Verfahrensmangel
KI-generiert
appeal_1984_eastern-finland__2394
Appeal court allows state compensation for litigation costs when increasing damages in civil proceedings.
kko-other_2003_555
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when lower court relies on facts not raised in the permitted settlement case.
kko-other_2006_720
Supreme Court dismissed client's claim for increased damages due to changed trial circumstances without prior appeal.
kko-other_2013_2021
Supreme Court allows fee claim for defense counsel regarding unexplained dismissal of time-based costs by lower court.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Puolustaja oli hovioikeudessa vaatinut korvausta matka-ajalta ja matkakuluista. Hovioikeus ei ollut lausunut mitään vaatimuksesta. Kysymys hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta.