Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2111/2010 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses occupational disease claim for back injuries sustained while operating a mining truck on uneven terrain.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2111/2010
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim that the driver's back injuries constituted an occupational disease. The plaintiff argued that continuous impacts and vibrations from operating a mining truck on rough terrain caused the injuries, while the employer contended the work conditions were not inherently hazardous. The court ruled that the specific nature of the work and the equipment did not meet the legal threshold for an occupational disease.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Work Act 1985; Occupational Disease Act 1985: Injuries sustained from operating heavy machinery on uneven terrain do not automatically constitute an occupational disease if the work conditions do not exceed normal risks.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
occupational disease back injuries heavy machinery uneven terrain workplace hazards Supreme Court compensation claim wetterbedingter Arbeitsausfall

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Work Act 1985
Occupational Disease Act 1985
KI-generiert
insurance_1981_4329-1980
Insurance court denied disability benefits for back injury but allowed compensation for hip fracture caused by the accident.
insurance_1982_9489-1981
Insurance court denied claim for back pain compensation when fracture was proven but pain was not directly linked.
insurance_1978_2918-1977
Finnish Insurance Court dismissed claim; Supreme Court ruled vibration-induced arthritis compensable as occupational disease.
insurance_1980_12375-1979
Insurance court dismissed claim for occupational disease compensation due to lack of causal link between work and injury.
insurance_1983_3825-1982
Insurance court dismisses claim where elderly worker's post-surgery disability is not linked to heavy labor.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kaivinkoneenkuljettaja A oli työskennellyt kivilouhimolla noin 25 vuoden ajan kuljettaen telakaivinkonetta ja pyöräkuormaajaa. Kivilouhimon maasto oli ollut epätasaista, kallioista ja kivistä louhikkoa. Kaivinkoneen istuin oli ollut kova ja jousittamaton. Kaivinkoneella tehtävissä töissä oli esiintynyt lanneselkään kohdistuneita jatkuvia iskuja ja tärähdyksiä. Kysymys siitä, oliko A:lla todetut lannerangan nikamakaaren murtumat korvattava ammattitautina.