Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 836/2009 KI-generiert

Dismissed claim for transfer compensation under Finnish Act 550/2009 as EU Directive 2001/23/EC Art. 2(2) does not apply to business transfers.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 836/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the employee's claim for compensation upon business transfer, ruling that the specific statutory provision cited does not apply in this context. The employee argued for protection under Finnish labor law and the EU Directive regarding transfer of undertakings, but the court found the transfer did not meet the necessary criteria for the cited article. Consequently, the court held that no compensation was due because the legal conditions for such a claim were not satisfied.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 6 of Chapter 7 of the Act on the Termination of Employment Contracts; Article 2(2) of Directive 2001/23/EC: Compensation for employees in the event of a transfer of an undertaking is not due if the transfer does not involve the transfer of an economic entity retaining its identity.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
transfer of undertaking employee compensation economic entity identity termination of employment EU Directive 2001/23 business transfer liability labor law protection Arbeitsausfall

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 6 of Chapter 7 of the Act on the Termination of Employment Contracts
Article 2(2) of Directive 2001/23/EC

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
KKO:2009:28
Supreme Court allows severance pay under Transfer Directive but dismisses damages for contract termination.
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2009_28
Supreme Court allows severance pay under Transfer Directive but dismisses damages for contract termination.
labour_1991_27
Labor court dismissed union claim for weekend pay during termination period where employee had no work duty.
labour_2008_104
Labor court dismissed union claim that employer terminated contract without cause after employee resigned post-suspension.
labour_2006_16
Labor court dismisses union's claim that employer failed supervisory duty regarding conditional dismissal and recall obligations.
labour_2017_29
Labor court dismisses claims because collective agreement covers termination, not part-time conversion reasons.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys liikkeen luovutuksen yhteydessä irtisanoutuneen työntekijän oikeudesta saada luovutuksensaajalta korvausta työsopimuslain 7 luvun 6 §:n nojalla ottaen huomioon Euroopan unionin Neuvoston direktiivin 2001/23/EY 4 artiklan 2 kohdan tulkinta. Ks. KKO:2009:28