KKO 342/2009
KI-generiert
Supreme Court held that compensation for work discrimination requires the victim to prove the suffering caused.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court ruled that a claimant seeking compensation for work discrimination must substantiate the actual suffering endured. The plaintiff argued that discrimination caused specific harm, while the defense contended that proof of suffering was lacking. The court decided that without concrete evidence of the suffering's existence and extent, the compensation claim could not be granted.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertWork Discrimination Act; Compensation Act: Compensation for work discrimination is only awarded if the claimant successfully proves the suffering caused by the discriminatory act.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
work discrimination
compensation claim
burden of proof
suffering evidence
labor law
civil liability
discrimination remedy
systemischer Mangel
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertWork Discrimination Act 1986
Compensation Act 1973
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-precedent_2009_46
Supreme Court dismisses spousal assault victim's claim for pain and suffering damages due to lack of severe dignity violation.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2020:97
Supreme Court allows considering prior discrimination compensation when calculating damages for personal suffering. The court ruled that damages for the same harm cannot be awarded multiple times. The court held that compensation for personal suffering must consider all damages awarded for the same harm. The court decided that compensation for personal suffering must consider all damages awarded for the same harm. The court decided that compensation for personal suffering must consider all damages awarded for the same harm.
insurance_2004_4554-2003
Court allows compensation for personal injury from assault threats inherent in breach of approach ban under criminal damage law.
insurance_2003_8939-2002
Court allows criminal damage compensation for victim fearing partner's safety in attempted kidnapping case.
kko-precedent_2008_79
Supreme Court allows compensation for deceased's adult children despite perpetrator's criminal immunity due to mental illness.
Volltext
Asianomistajat olivat vaatineet korvausta työsyrjinnän aiheuttamasta kärsimyksestä. Kysymys siitä, edellyttikö korvauksen tuomitseminen selvityksen esittämistä kärsimyksestä.