Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 310/2009 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows appeal on evidence submission regarding pilot's intoxication during flight.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 310/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the lower court's decision on the necessity of re-examining witness testimony. The lower court had found the pilot intoxicated based on witness observations but questioned the proper procedure for submitting evidence. The court ruled that the appellate court must conduct a full hearing to verify the factual basis of the intoxication claim.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Laki 1093/1999 oikeusprosessilain 101 ja 102 luvuista: The appellate court is obligated to conduct a full trial and re-examine the evidence when the lower court's findings on material facts are contested.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
appellate procedure evidence submission intoxication flight safety witness testimony voller Beweis medizinische Beweismittel unbewiesener Kausalzusammenhang

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Laki 1093/1999 oikeusprosessilain 101 luku
Laki 1093/1999 oikeusprosessilain 102 luku
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2002_15
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when appellate court increases sentence and oral hearing is clearly unnecessary.
kko-other_2009_718
Supreme Court held lower court must provide main hearing in compensation case to ensure fair trial rights.
kko-other_2010_2388
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer serious theft cases to main hearing without delay.
kko-other_2010_1291
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding High Court's duty to hold main trial for bookkeeping crime.
kko-precedent_2004_70
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; parties cannot call witness in court of appeal if they could not in lower court.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Lentoemännän työsopimuksen purkamista koskevassa asiassa hovioikeus oli käräjäoikeuden tuomiossa selostettujen todistajien havaintojen perusteella katsonut toisin kuin käräjäoikeus, että lentoemäntä oli ollut lennolla alkoholin vaikutuksen alaisena. Kysymys hovioikeuden velvollisuudesta toimittaa pääkäsittely ja vastaanottaa uudelleen kysymystä koskeva todistelu.