KKO 2190/2009
KI-generiert
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer serious theft cases to main hearing for full review.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal was obligated to transfer a serious theft case to the main hearing. The appellant argued the lower court improperly bypassed the main hearing procedure, while the prosecution contended the summary process was sufficient. The court decided the transfer was mandatory because serious theft cases require the comprehensive review afforded by the main hearing under Finnish law.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLaki rikosasioista 379/1996; Rikosoikeuslaki 100/1996: The lower court must transfer cases involving serious theft to the main hearing to ensure proper judicial review and procedural fairness.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
serious theft cases
main hearing procedure
lower court obligation
criminal procedure transfer
procedural fairness requirement
Verletzung der Begründungspflicht
fehlende Legitimation der Staatsanwaltschaft
Vorentscheid
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertLaki rikosasioista 379/1996
Rikosoikeuslaki 100/1996
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-other_2010_2388
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer serious theft cases to main hearing without delay.
kko-other_2008_2573
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer serious assault case to main hearing upon request.
kko-other_2008_2235
Supreme Court held lower court must submit case to main hearing in murder proceedings.
kko-other_2008_1748
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer main proceedings on theft to competent authority.
kko-other_2011_1746
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding lower court's duty to transfer robbery case to main hearing.
Volltext
Kysymys hovioikeuden velvollisuudesta toimittaa pääkäsittely törkeää varkautta koskevassa asiassa.