Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeal must transfer the main hearing to the Labour Court in termination disputes.

The Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal was obligated to transfer the main hearing regarding a termination of employment contract to the Labour Court. The appellant argued that the Court of Appeal lacked jurisdiction over the substantive dispute, while the respondent contended the appellate court could handle the matter. The court decided that under Finnish law, matters concerning the validity of employment contracts fall exclusively within the Labour Court's jurisdiction, necessitating the transfer.