Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1523/2009 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held that the court of the property's location has jurisdiction over price reduction claims.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1523/2009
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland ruled that the court of the property's location is the competent authority for claims to reduce a property purchase price. The plaintiff, A, sued defendant B in the local court where the real estate is situated, arguing for a price reduction. The court affirmed jurisdiction based on the specific location of the subject matter, rejecting any argument for venue elsewhere.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Korkein oikeus 10. luku 1. luvun 1. ja 2. kohta; The court of the place where the immovable property is located has jurisdiction over actions regarding the reduction of its purchase price.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
immovable property jurisdiction purchase price reduction competent court location real estate litigation venue determination Stellung der Baute Betrieblicher Standort Geschäftsniederlassung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
10. luku 1. luvun 1. ja 2. kohta
KI-generiert
appeal_1982_turku__561
Procedural objection to venue for foreclosure return of property case dismissed as jurisdiction lies with local court.
kko-precedent_1988_116
Supreme Court allows bankruptcy trustee to sue for voided sales in both courts due to transaction unity.
kko-precedent_2013_23
Supreme Court dismisses second claim for price reduction when first claim for contract rescission was finally decided.
kko-precedent_1991_48
Inadmissible: Inheritance court lacks jurisdiction over invalid gift declarations; case remitted to defendant's domicile court.
kho-precedent_2012_10
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against building permit when property faces construction site diagonally across street intersection.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli ostanut B:ltä kiinteistön sillä sijaitsevine rakennuksineen. A oli kiinteistön sijaintipaikan tuomioistuimessa vaatinut B:tä, jonka kotipaikka sijaitsi muualla, vastaan nostamallaan kanteella kiinteistön kauppahinnan alentamista. Kysymys toimivaltaisesta tuomioistuimesta.