Supreme Court held that filing a protest against enforcement of interim security ceases when enforcement proceedings are pending.

The Supreme Court ruled that the right to file a protest against the enforcement of interim security ceases once enforcement proceedings are pending. The applicant argued for the right to challenge the security measure, but the court found the procedural condition for filing a protest was not met. Consequently, the court allowed the protest only after the enforcement proceedings were concluded, effectively dismissing the initial filing due to the procedural bar.