Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2302/2008 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses interim injunction claim where defendant's comparative advertising is not proven false or misleading.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2302/2008
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's request for an interim injunction against the defendant's comparative advertising practices. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant used false and misleading statements regarding mobile phone networks but failed to substantiate these claims with evidence. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory requirements for granting an interim measure were not met due to the lack of proof regarding the falsity of the advertising.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

SopMenL 7 § 1 mom; An interim injunction may only be granted if the applicant demonstrates that the opponent's conduct is likely to cause irreparable harm and that the conduct is unlawful or would otherwise be prohibited by law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
interim injunction comparative advertising false statements misleading claims procedural requirements Supreme Court SopMenL Glaubhaftigkeitsanforderungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
SopMenL 7 § 1 mom

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
KKO:2008:96
Supreme Court allows temporary injunction against false mobile network marketing claims with 150k euro penalty.
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2008_96
Supreme Court allows temporary injunction against false mobile network marketing claims with 150k euro penalty.
kho-other_2016_61
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against Sami Council's decision to retry 2015 elections due to procedural violations.
market_1986_13
Market Court bans company from running discriminatory lotteries and misleadingly citing consumer protection ban.
kko-other_2016_2355
Supreme Court dismisses claim for damages from illegal competition restrictions due to statute of limitations expiration.
kho-precedent_2016_176
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed appeal; ad breaks and sponsor logos count toward ad time limits under Finnish Broadcasting Act.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli katsonut S:n käyttävän matkapuhelinverkkoja koskevassa vertailevassa mainonnassa totuudenvastaisia ja harhaanjohtavia ilmaisuja ja vaatinut, että S:ää kielletään väliaikaisesti jatkamasta menettelyään. Kysymys väliaikaisen kiellon määräämisen edellytyksistä ja niistä seikoista, jotka oli otettava huomioon väliaikaista kieltoa koskevaa hakemusta ratkaistaessa. Ks. KKO:2008:96

SopMenL 7 § 1 mom