KKO 2199/2008
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding failure to rescue and danger indicators under Rescue Act.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court's finding that the defendant failed to meet the statutory criteria for a rescue duty. The court noted that the specific indicators of danger and the necessity of immediate intervention were not established by the evidence presented. Consequently, the court ruled that the legal threshold for imposing liability for failure to rescue was not met in this instance.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertRescue Act 1994, s. 1; Criminal Code, s. 10: A failure to rescue constitutes a crime only when the statutory indicators of danger and the necessity of immediate intervention are clearly established.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
failure to rescue
rescue duty
danger indicators
criminal liability
Supreme Court
Rescue Act
immediate intervention
Ausnahmezustand
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertRescue Act 1994, s. 1
Criminal Code, s. 10
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-precedent_1997_48
Supreme Court holds open company not liable for fire damage; only Vapo Oy bears strict liability.
kko-other_2003_2320
Supreme Court dismisses claim for road damage compensation where road authority negligently filled a manhole while constructing a public road.
kko-precedent_1995_101
Supreme Court dismisses insurer's claim of gross negligence reduction due to mere forgetfulness in leaving stove on.
kho-other_2018_1236
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeal regarding environmental permit for concrete waste use in road construction. Appeal rejected due to lack of new evidence and procedural errors. Court upholds lower court's decision to allow waste use. Environmental permit granted for road construction using concrete waste. Appeal dismissed for procedural reasons and lack of merit. Waste use permitted without landowner consent under existing permit. Court rejects claim for landowner consent requirement.
kho-precedent_2008_51
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal against chemical plant permit due to direct impact on neighboring landowner's rights.
Volltext
Kysymys pelastustoimen laiminlyönnin ja vaaran aiheuttamisen tunnusmerkistöjen täyttymisestä.