Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1225/2008 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held that a drunk driving conviction does not automatically prove lack of criminal capacity.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1225/2008
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal regarding the defendant's criminal capacity at the time of the offense. The defendant argued that a conviction for severe drunken driving proved he lacked the mental capacity to commit the crime. The court rejected this, ruling that intoxication alone does not establish a lack of criminal responsibility under Finnish law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 10 of the Criminal Code; Section 10 of the Criminal Code establishes that a person is criminally responsible for an intentional or negligent act unless they lacked the capacity to understand the nature of the act or control their actions due to mental illness or developmental disorder, and intoxication is not a sufficient ground for such exemption.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
criminal capacity intoxication defense mental illness criminal responsibility Finnish Criminal Code drunk driving supreme court psychischer Gesundheitszustand

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 10 of the Criminal Code
KI-generiert
kko-other_1997_1381
Supreme Court held that a defendant's lack of understanding of crimes does not automatically preclude criminal liability.
kko-other_2006_13
Supreme Court held that a defendant with prior convictions lacked criminal responsibility due to mental illness.
kko-other_2004_2630
Supreme Court held that a defendant's lack of understanding during the crime negates criminal liability under Finnish law.
kko-other_2011_469
Supreme Court held a convicted official was not criminally liable due to lack of capacity at the time of the crime.
kko-other_1999_1869
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding conditional sentence for serious fraud and debtor insolvency.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, oliko törkeästä rattijuopumuksesta ynnä muusta rangaistukseen tuomittu ollut rikostensa tekoaikana syyntakeeton.