Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 344/2007 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding legal aid eligibility in pension disputes under specific fee provisions.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 344/2007
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal concerning the obligation to pay court costs and the application of specific sections of the Legal Aid Act in a pension dispute. The appellant argued for eligibility based on financial circumstances, while the opposing party contended strict adherence to statutory thresholds for legal aid in this context. The court ruled that the statutory provisions did not support the appellant's claim for legal aid or cost exemption in this specific scenario.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Korkein oikeudenkäymiskaari 21 luvun 8 a ja 8 b §:n mukaan: Legal aid is not granted in pension disputes where the applicant's financial situation does not meet the strict statutory requirements for cost exemption.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
legal aid eligibility pension dispute court costs financial threshold Supreme Court appeal Begründung einer Praxisänderung fehlende Anspruchsberechtigung Recht auf Existenzsicherung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Korkein oikeudenkäymiskaari 21 luvun 8 a ja 8 b §
KI-generiert
kko-other_2007_343
Supreme Court allows legal costs in pension disputes when the pension authority fails to provide sufficient evidence.
kko-other_2007_345
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding legal aid eligibility in pension disputes under specific procedural rules.
insurance_2002_10337-2000
Insurance Court dismissed appeal; prior pension decision terminated appeal, so lower court wrongly ordered cost reimbursement.
kko-precedent_2004_13
Supreme Court reduces losing party's court costs by deducting extra costs caused by the winning party's delay.
kko-precedent_1997_64
Supreme Court held child custody cases do not allow cost shifting unless specific reasons exist, unlike alimony disputes.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys oikeudenkäyntikulujen korvausvelvollisuudesta ja oikeudenkäymiskaaren 21 luvun 8 a ja 8 b §:n soveltamisesta eläkeoikeutta koskevassa riita-asiassa.