Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1080/2007 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses occupational disease claim for lung conditions caused by moldy workspaces.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1080/2007
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim that the applicant's lung conditions were occupational diseases arising from work between 1982 and 1999. The applicant alleged that mold damage in the workspaces caused asthma, allergic rhinitis, toxic syndrome, and allergic alveolitis. The court found insufficient evidence to establish a probable causal link between the specific environmental conditions and the diagnosed medical conditions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Workmen's Compensation Act 1982; Occupational Disease Act 1982: A medical condition is not recognized as an occupational disease if the causal connection between the work environment and the condition is not probable.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
occupational disease causal connection mold damage lung conditions workmen's compensation probable causation medical evidence Berufskrankheit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Workmen's Compensation Act 1982
Occupational Disease Act 1982
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2000_118
Supreme Court dismisses occupational disease claim due to insufficient evidence linking mold exposure to allergic rhinitis.
insurance_1983_10352-1981
Insurance court dismissed claim for occupational disease compensation due to lack of medical causation evidence.
kko-precedent_1998_22
Supreme Court allows occupational disease claim for mold-induced allergies after lower courts rejected it.
insurance_1981_5531-1980
Insurance court allows disability compensation for a painter's chemical-induced polyneuropathy under Finnish Act on Occupational Diseases.
kko-other_1998_2461
Supreme Court dismisses claim against employer for asbestos exposure compensation due to lack of statutory duty.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli työskennellyt vuosina 1982 - 1999 työtiloissa, joissa oli todettu kosteusvaurioita. Kysymys siitä, voitiinko keuhkoastmaa, allergista nuhaa, orgaanisten pölyjen aiheuttamaa toksista oireyhtymää sekä allergisen alveoliitin kaltaista keuhkoreaktiota pitää todennäköisesti pääasiallisesti A:n työstä johtuvina ja siten ammattitauteina korvattavina.