Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2856/2006 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows appeal against dismissal of fraud charges due to procedural defect in lower court composition.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2856/2006
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the appeal against the district court's dismissal of two fraud charges. The district court had dismissed the case under Section 17 of the Act on Criminal Proceedings, but the High Court could not rule on the appeal in its standard composition. Consequently, the Supreme Court remanded the case for a new trial in the High Court with a special composition to address the procedural irregularity.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 17 of the Act on Criminal Proceedings; Section 1 of Section 9 of the High Court Act: When a High Court cannot rule on an appeal in its standard composition due to a procedural defect in the lower court's decision, the Supreme Court must remand the case for a new trial in a specially composed High Court.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
fraud charges dismissal of case High Court composition procedural defect remand for retrial criminal proceedings special composition Verfahrensmangel

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 17 of the Act on Criminal Proceedings
Section 1 of Section 9 of the High Court Act

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
KKO:2006:16
Supreme Court dismisses appeal because criminal charge exceeds 5000 euro threshold for simplified court composition.
KI-generiert
kko-other_2009_2319
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court wrongly issues default judgment during preparation phase.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:53
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; summons with 3-month threat invalid when lawyer present and no personal hearing needed.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
kko-precedent_2013_44
Supreme Court allows appeal on costs in family case without further handling permission as it falls under application proceedings.
kko-other_2018_1977
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding refusal of further proceedings permission in fraud case.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Käräjäoikeus oli hylännyt A:n ajaman, kahta petosta koskevan kanteen oikeudenkäynnistä rikosasioissa annetun lain 7 luvun 17 §:n nojalla. Valituksessaan hovioikeudelle A vaati, että käräjäoikeuden tuomio kumotaan ja että asia palautetaan käräjäoikeuteen valmistelua ja pääkäsittelyä varten. Asiaa ei hovioikeudessa voitu ratkaista hovioikeuslain 9 §:n 1 momentissa tarkoitetussa kokoonpanossa. Ks. KKO:2006:16

ROL 7 luku 17 §

HovioikeusL 9 § 1 mom