Supreme Court dismisses claim for VAT on opponent's court costs as not recoverable from state.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's request to recover the value-added tax included in the opponent's court costs. The appellant argued that since the state ultimately bears the litigation costs, the VAT component should be reimbursable. The court held that the state's liability for court expenses does not extend to the VAT portion, which remains the opponent's responsibility.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLaki oikeudenkäyntikulujen maksamisesta (1093/1991) 1 luku 1 §; Laki arvonlisäverosta (1093/1994) 1 §: The state's obligation to pay court costs does not include the value-added tax component, which remains the liability of the losing party.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Kysymys jutun hävinneen kantajan velvollisuudesta korvata vastaajana olleen pankin hovioikeuskuluihin sisältynyt arvonlisäveron osuus.