KKO 2143/2006
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed claim for work accident compensation for tendon rupture due to lack of causation between work and injury.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the claim for work accident compensation regarding a tendon rupture in the client's hand. The client argued the injury occurred during work, but the court found no causal link between the work activity and the specific injury mechanism. Consequently, the claim was rejected because the injury did not arise from the performance of work duties.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertWork Injury Act; Work Accident Act: A work accident requires a causal link between the work activity and the injury; mere temporal proximity or similarity in location is insufficient to establish such a link.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
work accident compensation
causal link requirement
tendon rupture injury
work activity connection
Supreme Court dismissal
medizinische Überprüfung
fachärztliche Neubeurteilung
Distorsion der Halswirbelsäule
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertWork Accident Act 1985
Work Injury Act 1985
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-other_2009_731
Supreme Court held that a tendon detachment from a distant point cannot replace a work injury consequence.
kko-other_2000_1722
Supreme Court rules that a torn rotator cuff is not a work accident but a personal injury.
kko-other_2001_439
Work injury claim dismissed because pre-existing pain was not a direct cause of the new muscle tear.
kko-other_2011_2942
Supreme Court dismisses claim that shoulder rotator cuff and biceps tendon rupture caused a traffic accident.
kko-other_1997_4250
Supreme Court held that a gap between the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae is not a compensable accident consequence under private accident insurance.
Volltext
Kysymys hauislihaksen etäisemmän pään jänteen repeämän korvaamisesta työtapaturmana.