Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2134/2006 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses claim that post-accident shoulder pain and movement restrictions are consequences of the accident.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2134/2006
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim regarding whether his post-accident shoulder pain and movement restrictions were consequences of the accident. The plaintiff argued that the broad pain syndrome and functional impairment following the fracture were directly caused by the injury. The court found that the symptoms did not meet the legal threshold for establishing a causal link to the accident.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Lain 155/1991 1 luku 10 a luku; The court held that post-accident pain and functional impairment must be directly and exclusively caused by the accident to be recognized as its consequences.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
work injury compensation causation standard post-accident symptoms functional impairment medical evidence Supreme Court ruling disability assessment mangelhafte medizinische Sachverhaltsabklärung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Lain 155/1991 1 luku 10 a luku
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2007_60
Supreme Court allows compensation for chronic neck pain aggravated by accident despite pre-existing degeneration.
kko-other_2012_2460
Supreme Court dismissed claim for compensation where pain in left upper limb was not causally linked to the 2007 accident.
kko-other_1996_674
Workplace injury claim dismissed because employee's fall was caused by his own negligence, not employer fault.
insurance_2013_3812-2012
Insurance court allows disability pension for self-employed by weighing business income against medical evidence.
kko-other_2010_2277
Supreme Court dismisses claim for long-term disability and hip pain causation to accident.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli tapaturman seurauksena saanut oikean käden värttinäluun murtuman. Kysymys siitä, olivatko A:lla tapaturman jälkeen ilmenneet oikean yläraajan laaja-alainen kipuoireisto ja toiminnanhäiriö vapinaoireineen sekä oikean yläraajan luukato seurauksia tapaturmasta.