Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1855/2006 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal where prisoner's absence from trial was caused by transport cancellation due to his own conduct.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1855/2006
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the legality of the prisoner's absence from the High Court's main hearing. The appellant argued that his absence was lawful because the planned transport was cancelled due to his own behavior. The court held that the appellant's conduct directly caused the transport cancellation, rendering his absence unlawful and justifying the proceedings' continuation.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Laki vankeusrangaistuksen suorittamisesta 1066/1999; 1067/1999: The court ruled that a prisoner's absence from a hearing is unlawful if the transport cancellation was a direct result of the prisoner's own conduct, thereby negating the claim of lawful absence.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
prisoner absence transport cancellation own conduct lawful absence High Court hearing Supreme Court appeal criminal execution law Nachfluchtgrund

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Laki vankeusrangaistuksen suorittamisesta 1066/1999
Laki vankeusrangaistuksen suorittamisesta 1067/1999
KI-generiert
kko-other_2026_341
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding illegal entry facilitation where applicant failed to prove state responsibility.
kko-other_1999_314
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding criminal law reduction under Section 33 when conditions not met.
kko-precedent_2016_84
Supreme Court found a valid health excuse prevented the defendant from attending trial, ruling the lower court's dismissal of his right to be heard was erroneous.
kko-precedent_2002_94
Supreme Court dismisses request to extend deadline for challenging a partition deed under procedural law.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:63
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; applicant who withdrew guardianship application must pay opponent's litigation costs.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, oliko vankeusrangaistusta suorittamassa olleella valittajalla ollut laillinen syy olla poissa hovioikeuden pääkäsittelystä, kun suunniteltu kuljetus oli peruuntunut hänen käyttäytymisensä takia.