Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1433/2006 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses claim for additional payments when income was incorrectly entered too low in a payment scheme.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1433/2006
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the claimant's request for additional payments due to an underestimation of income in the payment scheme. The court found that the claimant had failed to provide sufficient evidence proving the actual income exceeded the declared amount. Consequently, the court ruled that the obligation to pay additional sums was not established under the relevant tax regulations.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 10 of the Income Tax Act; Section 11 of the Income Tax Act: The court held that a taxpayer cannot claim additional payments based on an underestimation of income unless they can substantiate the discrepancy with credible evidence.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
income tax payment scheme understated income claim burden of proof taxpayer additional payment obligation tax assessment correction Neuberechnung der Ergänzungsleistungen Berechnung und Satz der Erstattung finanzielle Korrekturen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 10 of the Income Tax Act
Section 11 of the Income Tax Act
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2012_78
Supreme Court rules debt claims under zero-payment plan do not prescribe until a court-enforceable decision is made.
kko-other_2017_1756
Supreme Court held that for debt repayment schemes, the old law applies to additional payments due before the new law's effective date.
kko-precedent_2002_26
Supreme Court dismisses debt plan termination due to undisclosed income increase, allowing modification instead.
kko-precedent_1995_136
Supreme Court extends debt repayment plan start date to when debtor is expected to have funds.
admin_2017_eastern-finland__698
Administrative court allows appeal review of parking fine interest via summary review due to non-expired debt status.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys velallisen velvollisuudesta maksaa lisäsuorituksia, kun tulot oli merkitty maksuohjelmaan liian alhaisiksi. Kysymys myös lisäsuoritusvelvollisuuden kohtuullistamisesta.