KKO 13/2006
KI-generiert
Supreme Court held that a defendant with prior convictions lacked criminal responsibility due to mental illness.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court of Finland allowed the appeal regarding the defendant's criminal responsibility. The defendant, convicted of serious assault, argued he lacked mental capacity at the time of the crime due to a mental disorder. The court found that the defendant's prior convictions and the nature of the alleged disorder demonstrated a lack of understanding required for criminal liability.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLaki rikosvastuusta 1944; 10.1.2006 KKO 13/2006: A person who, due to a mental disorder, lacks the capacity to understand the nature or unlawfulness of their actions is not criminally responsible.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
criminal responsibility
mental disorder
lack of understanding
assault conviction
Supreme Court appeal
ungenügendes psychiatrisches Gutachten
psychische Beeinträchtigung
psychische Folgeschäden
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertLaki rikosvastuusta 1944
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-other_2004_2630
Supreme Court held that a defendant's lack of understanding during the crime negates criminal liability under Finnish law.
kko-other_1995_4261
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding mental state for aggravated assault where emergency defense was excessive.
kko-other_1997_1381
Supreme Court held that a defendant's lack of understanding of crimes does not automatically preclude criminal liability.
kko-precedent_2002_2
Supreme Court of Finland allows prison sentence for child abuse instead of fine due to victim's vulnerability.
kko-other_2008_1225
Supreme Court held that a drunk driving conviction does not automatically prove lack of criminal capacity.
Volltext
Kysymys siitä, oliko törkeästä pahoinpitelystä ynnä muusta rangaistukseen tuomittu ollut rikostensa tekoaikana ymmärrystä vailla.