KKO 3139/2005
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed appeal on legal aid costs where applicant failed to prove necessity of legal representation.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's appeal regarding the state's liability for legal aid costs. The applicant argued that legal representation was essential for their defense, but the lower court found no evidence of necessity. Consequently, the court ruled that the state is not liable for costs when the need for a lawyer is not substantiated.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLain 1087/1991 10 luku 1 §; Lain 1087/1991 10 luku 2 §: The state is not liable for legal aid costs if the applicant cannot demonstrate the necessity of legal representation.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
legal aid costs
necessity of representation
state liability
legal aid entitlement
supreme court appeal
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertLain 1087/1991 10 luku 1 §
Lain 1087/1991 10 luku 2 §
Volltext
Kysymys oikeudenkäyntikulujen korvausvelvollisuudesta.