KKO 1921/2005
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed claim for damages against public authority for breach of public procurement law.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for damages alleging a breach of the Public Procurement Act. The plaintiff argued that the public authority failed to fulfill its obligations under Section 8 of the Act, causing financial loss. The court ruled that the statutory provisions did not establish a liability for damages in this specific context.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertKysymys julkisista hankinnoista annetun lain 8 § 1 momentti; The Supreme Court held that the public authority is not liable for damages under the cited provision for the alleged breach.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
public procurement law
liability for damages
public authority breach
Section 8 Procurement Act
Supreme Court decision
financial compensation claim
administrative liability
abgewiesener Bieter
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertSection 8, paragraph 1 of the Act on Public Procurement
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertECLI:FI:KHO:2020:39
Court dismisses bid rejection claim where tenderer failed to notice non-compliant attachment before award decision.
kho-other_2019_368
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed public procurement appeal where group was excluded from tender process before eligibility review. Group failed to join tender procedure timely, so no compensation possible despite alleged errors.
market_2021_H181
Market Court dismisses bid rejection appeal, ruling procurement authority acted correctly on new information.
market_2021_H267
Market Court dismissed Skanska's appeal, ruling the procurement authority had valid grounds to terminate the tender process.
kho-precedent_2011_72
Public procurement law permits excluding bids that fail tender requirements unless those requirements violate the law.
Volltext
Kysymys julkisista hankinnoista annetun lain mukaisesta vahingonkorvausvelvollisuudesta.
L julkisista hankinnoista 8 § 1 mom