KKO 1515/2005 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed appeal where claim was directed at wrong defendant and could not be dismissed for that reason.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1515/2005

Gericht / Behörde Korkein oikeus

Rechtsordnung

Finnland (FI)

Entscheiddatum 17.06.2005

Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a decision to dismiss the main claim for lack of standing. The appellant argued the claim should have been dismissed because it targeted the wrong defendant, but the court found no legal basis for such dismissal. Consequently, the lower court's decision to reject the claim was upheld as the procedural defect did not justify dismissal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Laki 1093/1972 oikeusvaltuutetun lainkäyttövelvollisuudesta 1 §; Laki 621/1999 oikeusvaltuutetun lainkäyttövelvollisuuden purkamisesta 1 §: The court cannot dismiss a claim solely because it is directed at the wrong defendant if the claimant lacks standing or if the procedural defect does not meet statutory requirements for dismissal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

wrong defendant dismissal of claim standing requirements procedural defect Supreme Court ruling Berichtigung des Kanzleifehlers Verletzung von Parteirechten Kanzleiversehen