Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1294/2005 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held that appeals regarding oral evidence credibility in serious tax cases must be heard in court, not filtered.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1294/2005
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that an appeal concerning the credibility of oral evidence in a serious tax fraud case could not be filtered out. The lower court had attempted to dismiss the appeal based on procedural grounds, but the material facts required a full hearing on the evidence's reliability. Consequently, the court decided the appeal must proceed to the Court of Appeal for a substantive review.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

OK 26 luku 2 §; OK 26 luku 15 § 1 mom: When the resolution of a serious criminal case depends on the credibility of oral evidence received at the district court, the appeal cannot be filtered and must be heard in the court of appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
oral evidence credibility tax fraud case appeal filtering procedural outcome court of appeal unbewiesener Kausalzusammenhang Verletzung der Begründungspflicht ungenügender Nachweis der Gesundheitsverschlechterung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
OK 26 luku 2 §
OK 26 luku 15 § 1 mom
KI-generiert
kko-other_2001_500
Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding failure to submit case file to lower court in criminal proceedings.
kko-other_2010_2388
Supreme Court held lower court must transfer serious theft cases to main hearing without delay.
kko-other_2006_256
Supreme Court held lower court must organize main hearing in criminal case involving serious offenses.
kko-precedent_2001_16
Supreme Court reverses lower court for failing to hear key witnesses during retrial in child custody case.
kko-other_2023_180
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding lower court's duty to provide evidence for serious theft trial.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kun törkeää veropetosta ym. koskevan asian ratkaiseminen riippui käräjäoikeudessa vastaanotetun suullisen todistelun uskottavuudesta ja asiassa oli siten toimitettava pääkäsittely hovioikeudessa, valitusta ei voitu seuloa.

OK 26 luku 2 §

OK 26 luku 15 § 1 mom