Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 514/2004 KI-generiert

Supreme Court held that damage from road construction compensation under Building Act is not a requisition case.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 514/2004
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the claim that compensation for building damage caused by road construction constituted a requisition under the Requisition Act. The plaintiff argued the compensation was effectively a requisition, but the court distinguished between voluntary compensation under the Building Act and compulsory requisition. The decision clarified that statutory compensation for construction damage does not trigger the legal procedures of the Requisition Act.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Building Act s. 76; Requisition Act s. 1: Compensation for damage caused by public construction under the Building Act is not considered a requisition and does not require the procedures of the Requisition Act.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Building Act compensation road construction damage requisition law distinction statutory compensation public works liability städtebauliches Problem Stadterneuerung Denkmalschutz

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Building Act s. 76
Requisition Act s. 1
KI-generiert
kho-other_2017_4580
Supreme Administrative Court dismisses appeals against a zoning plan amendment permitting a large retail store on a central area.
kko-precedent_2001_61
City liable for road vibration damage; minor wall cracks exempt from tolerance duty under environmental damage act.
kho-other_2017_4109
Appeal dismissed; late response ignored, and planning authority members not biased by store interests.
kko-precedent_1987_121
Supreme Court dismisses compensation claim for loss of underground space value and extracted stone rights under expropriation law.
kho-other_2018_5116
Supreme Administrative Court allows appeal regarding staff transfer to company but dismisses claim on title change.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, oliko kadun rakentamisesta aiheutuneesta rakennuksen vaurioitumisesta rakennuslain 76 §:n nojalla tehty korvausvaatimus käsiteltävä lunastuslain mukaan.