Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2862/2002 KI-generiert

Company liable for radio/TV use of its restaurant's music under copyright law indirect use provision.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2862/2002
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that a company must pay royalties for the radio and television broadcasting of music played in its restaurant. The company argued it was not liable for indirect use, but the court found the broadcasting constituted a direct use under the Copyright Act. Consequently, the company was ordered to compensate the rights holders for the duration of the broadcasts.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Copyright Act 47 §; Copyright Act 50 §: The operator of a venue where music is played is liable for royalties when that music is subsequently broadcast via radio or television, as such broadcasting constitutes a direct use of the work.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Copyright Act indirect use radio broadcasting television transmission venue operator liability royalty payment direct use provision Radio- und Fernsehabgabe

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Copyright Act 47 §
Copyright Act 50 §
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1992_55
Local radio must pay royalties for pre-1983 foreign recordings under national treatment principle.
kko-precedent_2002_48
Company liable for public performance royalties via music machines in restaurants under Copyright Act s. 47.1.
insurance_1984_80-1984
Insurance court allowed costs for a mobile phone as necessary rehabilitation treatment to maintain work capacity.
insurance_1996_5558-1995
Self-employed photographer working for theater association is not an employee under insurance law.
kho-precedent_1997_27
Supreme Administrative Court dismissed VAT deduction claim where taxpayer failed to meet strict documentation requirements for input tax recovery.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Yhtiö oli liiketoiminnassaan vuosina 1991 - 1997 esittänyt omistamassaan ravintolassa ääniteperäistä musiikkia radion ja television välityksellä. Kysymys siitä, oliko yhtiö velvollinen suorittamaan esittäville taiteilijoille ja äänitteiden tuottajille kyseisestä äänitteiden niin sanotusta välillisestä käyttämisestä tekijänoikeuslain 47 §:ssä tarkoitettua korvausta.