Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1082/2002 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows second parent to deduct significant travel expenses from child support when visitation rights are exercised.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1082/2002
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the second parent to deduct substantial travel costs from child support payments. The applicant argued that significant expenses incurred for exercising visitation rights should be offset against the financial obligation. The court ruled that such deductions are permissible when the travel costs are objectively significant and directly linked to the visitation arrangement.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Laki lapsen elatuksesta 1056/1987, 10 §; Laki lapsen elatuksesta 1056/1987, 11 §: The court permits the deduction of significant travel expenses from child support when a parent exercises visitation rights, provided the costs are substantial and directly attributable to the visitation.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
child support deduction travel expenses offset visitation rights costs parental travel costs alimony expense reimbursement Dienstreisekosten, Fahrkosten, Wohnungskosten Pendlerkostenbeitrag Asylgrund

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Laki lapsen elatuksesta 1056/1987, 10 §
Laki lapsen elatuksesta 1056/1987, 11 §
KI-generiert
appeal_1980_vaasa__460
Court allows child support despite voluntary evasion by parent due to special heavy reasons.
kko-other_2023_99
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding child support changes affecting continuation of social assistance allowance.
kko-precedent_1995_50
Supreme Court reduces child support based on lower living costs in Estonia despite Finnish residence.
kko-precedent_1998_4
Supreme Court allows alimony increase when recipient fails to provide income evidence, bearing adverse consequences.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:48
Supreme Court dismisses alimony reduction claim due to significant savings and asset liquidation by the payer.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, voitiinko toinen vanhemmista vapauttaa maksamasta lapselle elatusapua tapaamisoikeudesta aiheutuvien huomattavien matkakulujen perusteella.