Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1164/2001 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows seller to claim payment from buyer who withheld part of the price due to a defect.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1164/2001
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court ruled that a seller could be ordered to pay the amount withheld by the buyer when the buyer had a right to a price reduction based on a defect. The lower court found the buyer entitled to a reduction equal to the withheld portion but failed to address the seller's claim for the remaining balance. The court clarified that the right to a price reduction does not automatically extinguish the buyer's obligation to pay the reduced price, allowing the seller to recover the withheld amount.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Sales Act 1973, Section 25; Sales Act 1973, Section 26: A buyer's right to a price reduction for a defect does not release the buyer from the obligation to pay the reduced price, and the seller may claim the amount withheld by the buyer.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
sales contract price reduction defect in goods withheld payment seller's claim buyer's obligation remedies for breach Rückerstattungspflicht

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Sales Act 1973, Section 25
Sales Act 1973, Section 26
KI-generiert
kko-other_2026_335
Supreme Court remands sale auction case for failure to notify buyer of appeal hearing opportunity.
appeal_1984_helsinki__1954
Court dismissed appeal as defendant admitted liability and amount, making court's own reduction of damages procedurally improper.
kko-other_2001_1617
Supreme Court dismissed appeal where lower court awarded price reduction instead of full restitution for property error.
kko-other_2018_2306
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court's award of price reduction and damages for construction defects.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__1847
Court dismissed appeal claiming victim's new claims after case remand were inadmissible due to prior finality.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Ostaja oli kaupan kohteen virheen perusteella pidättynyt maksamasta osaa kauppahinnasta. Ostajan myyjää vastaan ajaman kanteen johdosta hovioikeus katsoi, että ostajalla oli oikeus hinnanalennukseen, joka määrältään vastasi ostajan pidättämää osuutta kauppahinnasta. Kysymys siitä, voitiinko myyjä velvoittaa suorittamaan tuo määrä ostajalle.