Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 2583/2000 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows compensation for work-related muscle strain treated as occupational disease under Finnish Act on Work-Related Diseases.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 2583/2000
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed compensation for a worker who suffered a muscle strain while lifting a heavy cart. The court determined that although the injury was not a formal accident, it equated to a work-related disease under the Act on Work-Related Diseases. Consequently, the claimant was entitled to benefits under the Accident Insurance Act.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Act on Work-Related Diseases 1993, Section 1, Paragraph 6; Act on Accident Insurance 1983: Muscle strain caused by work tasks is deemed a work-related disease and qualifies for accident insurance compensation.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
work-related disease muscle strain occupational injury compensation entitlement lifting tasks natürliche Kausalität beim Schleudertrauma Kausalität der Schulterverletzung einfache Körperverletzung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Act on Work-Related Diseases 1993, Section 1, Paragraph 6
Act on Accident Insurance 1983
KI-generiert
kko-other_2001_439
Work injury claim dismissed because pre-existing pain was not a direct cause of the new muscle tear.
kko-other_1997_4250
Supreme Court held that a gap between the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae is not a compensable accident consequence under private accident insurance.
insurance_1979_2790-1978
Insurance court dismissed work injury claim for shoulder tear caused by lifting heavy package.
kko-other_1996_674
Workplace injury claim dismissed because employee's fall was caused by his own negligence, not employer fault.
kko-other_1996_320
Workplace injury claim dismissed as employee's own negligence caused the accident.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A oli työssään nostanut oikealla kädellä painavaa maitokärryä ja saanut oikean hauislihaksen etäisemmän pään jänteen repeämän. Vamma oli aiheutunut todennäköisesti nostoliikkeen seurauksena. A:lla ei todettu muuta vikaa, vammaa tai sairautta, mistä repeämä olisi voinut mahdollisesti aiheutua. Kysymyksessä ei ollut tapaturma mutta vamman katsottiin rinnastuvan eräistä työtapaturmina korvattavista vammoista annetun asetuksen 1 §:n 6 kohdassa tarkoitettuun kipeytymiseen ja oikeuttavan tapaturmavakuutuslain mukaiseen korvaukseen.